Woodsong

Perrinville Creek

It’s the middle of winter, but the fifty-five-degree air says something else. The ground is damp, and my shoes make a gentle sucking sound as they sink and release against the trail surface. Small birds pinball their way through the brush. Their strident call trills like an old-style bicycle bell, only two octaves higher. At intervals through the leafless brambles I see casualties of the windstorm that slapped its way through the region last week: a large limb with freshly exposed heartwood rests horizontally on its branches, appearing to hover above the ground, frozen in mid-fall; a thick, bark-less snag lies flat in disarticulated sections at abrupt angles from each other, reminding me of those hollow segmented tent supports with a central elastic cord that keeps disconnected pieces in close proximity to the joint.

The dog and I decide to leave the main path and explore a narrow spur trail that leads us downhill through a series of switchbacks to the bottom of the ravine, to the shallow creek that moves in pulses between waterfall-bounded pools formed by previous years’ treefall. It is on our way back up the switchbacks, toward the top where the panorama of the ravine opens up, that it hits me.

Hit is not quite the right word. Hit works well to describe both the immediacy of the insight and the instantaneousness of its initial effects—its impact, if you will, but fails to capture its emergent quality, its insidiousness, the sense that it has been there all along in a primal form, latent, inchoate, incipient, gathering its strength imperceptibly, building slowly until it crosses some critical threshold and explodes into being like a sudden afternoon thunderstorm.

It might have been the way the noonday sun fell into the alder trees, their trunks and leafless branches resplendent, completely enwrapped in moss, emitting a luminous green glow somewhere between emerald and jade, radiant and seemingly in motion, a terrestrial aurora borealis. Or maybe it was the large stump to my right, also draped in moss, its base rotted into three sharp spires like stalagmites thrusting skyward, longingly, as if lost in nostalgic reminiscence. It could have been the fragrant shadow of the cedar behind me, or the perfect line of tiny golden mushrooms cued along the slab of rotting bark at my feet. Or the small spruce, recently snapped by a falling neighbor, its slender and limbless trunk bent at a sharp angle to the ground, wet outer layers of wood at the break still intact, peeled back in scallops like the lid of a rusty tin can opened by a cartoon can opener. Or something else sitting just beyond my perceptual grasp.

My life is here, my past and present, written in the wood around me, captured in a fidelity that mere language could never match. A multivolume biography with copious endnotes. Every trivial detail, every nuance, every tragedy, every fear and challenge and hope and regret, all here. Exactly this!

Intuitive

Complexity is the norm, the natural state of the universe. Even simple primates like us have evolved to master the complex, the densely interwoven, the multifarious. Neuroscientists credit our right hemisphere, the holistic hemisphere, with our capacity to navigate the subtle nuances and intricacies of our continually changing circumstances. We enter a room, and right away we feel something is off; there is a “bad vibe” or an uneasiness to the atmosphere. The feeling emerges directly, and long before we are able to identify its source—and often we never actually locate the source, or we misidentify the source, indicting a feature that is salient but ultimately benign.

Intuition, that potent and spontaneous prod that can make us look up or suddenly change course, is our species’ response to complexity. And it is feeling that has the rudder. The right hemisphere is not adept at expressing itself conceptually—concepts being largely a linguistic, left-hemisphere creation—but has, over the eons, become a maestro of emotion. More can be carried atop a momentary impression, a fleeting feeling, than can be packed into a library’s worth of words.

One of the many paradoxes of modern civilization is that it involves a radical simplification of complexity. Despite its labyrinthine bureaucracies and its sparkly surface distractions, civilization replaces subtlety with garishness and nuance with coarseness. Hues that bleed into each other in novel and unpredictable tones are forcefully overlaid with granular categories, standardized and homogenized for maximum distribution, with a premium on the lowest common denominator. And so, we have reds and blues and greens and their approved variants, but we have no words for the densely shaded chromatic spaces between the dominant stripes of the rainbow. We have a single word for lavender, despite the infinity of colors enfolding a single flower.

On the danger of platitudes

Daniel Dennett called them deepities, those quips and clichés and truisms that seem to be capturing some profound truth, but, on closer inspection, turn out to be meaningless gibberish. If not simply tautological, they are either logically incoherent, so general as to be informationally vacuous, or, quite frequently, demonstrably false.

“Love is eternal.” “Happiness is where you least expect it.” “Beauty is only skin deep.” “Everything happens for a reason.” “Time heals all wounds.” “That which doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.” “Age is just a number,” and “You are only as old as you feel.” Several of these are clearly false. Others are entirely empty of content. Love is either a meaningless abstraction, or, at best, a transient emotional posture. Either way, there is nothing eternal about it. Happiness is a result, an outcome, not an object occupying space. The surface appearance of beauty is critically dependent on the bone and tissue structures beneath the skin. Much of what happens is simply random, with no reason behind it whatsoever. Wounds can fester and become gangrenous with time, and that which doesn’t kill you can leave you quadriplegic. Yes, age is a number—we use the enumeration of years as a way of designating the passage of time—but just a number? Really? Even if it was possible to feel a specific age, a feeling can’t change how long you have been in existence.    

These seem harmless on the surface. But in a society of distraction, where there is little opportunity to consider the truth-value of the many bits and chunks of information spattered at us, the unexamined is taken at face value, and our understanding of the world becomes a piece of cheap box-store furniture: preformed and predrilled for quick assembly, but likely to collapse if actually used.